A former National Publicity Secretary of the
Peoples Democratic Party, Mr. Olisa Metuh, insisted before the Federal High
Court in Abuja, on Tuesday, his further testimony in his ongoing trial would be
dependent on what former President Goodluck Jonathan would tell the court in
respect of the case.
His lawyer, Mr. Emeka Etiaba (SAN), and the
counsel representing his company –Destra Investments Limited – Mr. Tochukwu
Onwugbufor (SAN), had earlier said this before the court on Monday.
But the trial judge, Justice Okon Abang, had, in
a ruling on Monday, dismissed the submission as unknown to law.
The judge maintained his position on
Tuesday and ordered Metuh to continue his defence on Wednesday (today), while
the court bailiff would make another attempt to serve Jonathan on December 11.
“Whether a party will call a witness or not
cannot be predicated on the evidence of a witness yet to be called,” Justice
Abang ruled again on Tuesday.
But Etiaba said he would appeal against the
judge’s decisions.
The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission had
alleged in some of the seven counts preferred against Metuh and his company,
Destra Investments Limited, that the ex-PDP spokesperson fraudulently received
the sum of N400m from the Office of the National Security Adviser without any
justification.
The EFCC also alleged that Metuh spent the funds
on the party and for personal affairs.
The accused person was also accused of
transacting business with $2m cash said to be above the threshold of cash
payments prescribed by the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act.
But Metuh had insisted that both the then NSA,
Sambo Dasuki, who released the sum of N400m and Jonathan, who allegedly
authorised the payment, were required to testify in the case.
While the summons served on Dasuki had been
successfully executed, following which the ex-NSA had testified in the case,
the court bailiff had yet to be able to serve Jonathan personally.
On Monday, while ordering the court bailiff to
make another attempt to serve Jonathan with the witness summons, the judge
insisted that the trial must continue with Metuh either testifying himself or
calling on another witness other than the former President as his next witness.
The judge then fixed Tuesday for continuation of
trial.
But at the resumed hearing on Tuesday, Metuh’s
lawyer, Etiaba, insisted that Metuh still wanted Jonathan to first testify
before deciding on whether or not he would personally testify in the case.
Etiaba stated, “This morning, we are unable
to produce a witness for continuation of trial for two reasons.
“First, we have a witness on subpoena in the
person of Dr. Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, GCFR, former President of Nigeria, who
is a vital witness for the first defendant and after his testimony, we will
appraise the case of the first defendant with a view to making up our minds as
to whether we will need further testimony of the first defendant or another
witness.
“Yesterday (Monday) an order was made by this
honourable court for the subpoena to be personally served on December 11, 2017
in line with the affidavit deposed to by the bailiff of this honourable court.”
The lawyer added that Metuh could not also
testify on Monday, because a document he sought to rely on was in the custody
of one his aides, Sam Nwosu, who was said to have travelled to Anambra State
for the PDP congress.
“In the circumstance, we apply for an adjournment
to enable the first defendant to present his defence guaranteed under Section
36(6)(b) and (d) of the Constitution.”
Supporting Etiaba’s submissions, Onwugbufor said
it was not for the court to choose for Metuh “which witness to call first, when
to call the witness or if the defendant himself wants to give evidence.”
Responding, EFCC’s prosecuting counsel, Mr.
Sylvanus Tahir, opposed the application for adjournment.
He described the application as untenable and
lame.
Ruling, Justice Abang said rather than compel
Metuh to present another witness on Tuesday, he would adjourn in the interest
of justice until Wednesday to enable Metuh to call another witness.
